Thanks Ted, I copy that Xmas is closing up fast now Can't wait Phileica Ted Grant wrote: >David Young offered: >Subject: [LRflex] Re: Vario elmar F4: 70-210 - questions to trinklers<<< > > David, >I had one of these pieces of junk! Yes I did have some decent looking B&W & >colour negatives along with Kodachromes while it stayed together. > >However, it gradually fell apart in my hands! Like everything wiggled in the >lens barrel I eventually gave it to Rhinehold Mueller for parts and bought >the Apo 70-180. Now there's a piece of glass and a ton of quality! > >I eventually sold it for basically no reason. Of course felt bad after, as >is the case anytime one sells a Leica lens they think they don't use enough >to warrant owning it. However it was replaced with one of the best damn zoom >lenses I've had in hand... the Leica R 80-200 f.4.0! A Super lens and cuts >like a razor blade, film or digital! > >I use it as a regular lens with the Leicanon 20D usually around 5.6 or 8. >Wide open? Yep lots of times when I shoot a subject that's sharp in >foreground and want the background to go into the most beautiful mush of >colour one can want. Oh yes and as I do when many others don't, I use it >with the 2X extender lots of times. I mean nothing like a 160-400 f 8.00 >lens! > >A beauty lens. As far as the 70-210 and a cheap price? hell save your money >and get the 80-200 receiving a far better value for your money in the long >run! > >ted > > >------ >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >Archives are at: > www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/