David, I like the second: a marriage of technology and art; the diagonal background adds a sense of "movement" to the composition. All the best, Bill On Jun 16, 2007, at 5:39 PM, David Young wrote: This morning, I posted a shot (Big Game Hunting) of a hummingbird in flight. As I have been going though the hummer shots, I've found many (MANY!) that simply were not in focus, despite my best efforts. By the time, my brain said fire, they'd already moved on! At one point, as a test, I set the 30D to 5fps, and in one shot, the hummer is very well exposed, and sharp as a tack. In the next, she's completely gone! All in 200ms! I have found one other, which I think may be superior to the first. I'm looking at a 12x18" (30x45cm) print as I type, and it looks as sharp in that, as the web image does on the screen. What is it that Douglas says?.... I am "gob-smacked"! It can be seen at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/FRHB2.htm For those who missed it, the first one is at http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/ and then please click on "Featured Photo"... (on your left). Now I'm having a hard time deciding which one I like best! Any preferences??? Thanks for looking. :-) Cheers! --- David Young, Logan Lake, CANADA Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/ Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4 ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/