[LRFlex] Re: The World... I mean ultrawide, is not enough!

  • From: Jim Hemenway <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:50:18 -0500

Hi Doc:

Did you see the enlargements for the Boston-from-Hull shot?

You can see the difference there, in the color fringing on the lighthouse. I also get it on horizons, all with the Arsat.

It doesn't matter in a small print, but it definitly shows up in 13x13 prints.

The Arsat/Distagon shot were taken hand-held and I think that the difference would be even more apparent if I had used the tripod.

Still, about $300 for a new Arsat versus about $3,000 for a used F-Distagon will make the Arsat the choice for a lot of people.

Jim

P.S. I don't have any other Arsat lenses to test so I can't answer your question.





Dr. Elliot Puritz wrote:

Jim and Art: Jim, I thank you for posting the very interesting side by side comparisons. I don't see very much difference. Am I missing something? As compared to their Hasselblad cousins, do the other Arsat lenses perform as well? Certainly the price points are apparently very much in favor of the Arsat lenses.
Thanks.


Elliot
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Hemenway" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 4:34 PM
Subject: [LRFlex] The World... I mean ultrawide, is not enough!


Art:

I'll let you decide that yourself. Here's a comparison I did several months ago between the Arsat and the F-Distagon. Both are 30mm fisheye lenses for medium format.

http://209.197.89.228/ArsatDistagon

Thanks for telling me about that Soligor.

Jim

NATSTEK@xxxxxxx wrote:

Jim,
How is the Arsat lens? I've heard that it's very sharp and contrasty.
As far as using a fisheye on medium format, I have an old Soligor fisheye converter lens with a .15 conversion factor. This is the high dollar one with its own diaphragm that's adjustable. I have several adapters for it including bay 1 & bay 3 adapters for use on rollei twin lenses, or my Yashica mat 124G. I first mount the lens on the viewing lens, focus, and then transfer the lens to the taking lens and shoot.
With the conversion factor of .15, the 75mm camera lens becomes an 11.25.. lens! This is a circular image fisheye. I've used it on a 90mm Summicron to get a nearly full frame 13.5mm. A 100mm gives 15mm.
These are fun lenses if you can find them. They were made under several manufacturer's names, but were all high quality construction with adjustable apertures and a lens size/f-stop conversion scale so you could figure effective aperture settings for pretty much any lens that you mounted the conversion lens on to.
Art Tafil


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
   www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/


------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: