Kevin, I was curious about your R6.2 CLA situation, and since I have never used or owned an R6 or R6.2, only an R4, an R4S, an R7, and an R9, I Googled "R6.2" and what came up at the top of the list was a page in Karen Nakamura's excellent website, www.photoethnography.com: http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?LeicaR6.html~mainFrame On the web page was this sentence that caught my eye and which may shed some light on Solms's high CLA expense (or maybe not!): > "With their intricate clockwork timing mechanisms, mechanical shutters are > expensive to make. For example, a new R6.2 was more expensive than the much > higher-tech R8!" She also added a correction to her original page, noting that in addition to the meter that does not work with a dead battery, the self-timer won't work either. Good luck! All the best, Bill On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Kevin Willey wrote: > David and other Leica Respondees, > > Thank you for the tip. I will send my camera to Kindermann because of your > strong endorsements. > Having done that, my wife will probably begin to talk to me again and even > pickup the R6.2 upon its return. > > Cheers, > > Kevin > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/