A sixties postcard colour treatment ? Nowhereneverland, you said? Thanks for sharing this while of fun. Amitiés, Marc ----- Original Message ----- From: AMARD philippe To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 12:17 PM Subject: [LRflex] Re: Skies and seas and nowhereland On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:32:26 +0200 "Marc Dufour" wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > Don't make me blush, mon ami ! > I'm pretty sure a good "sand" of mines is like hundreds >ruled out by LC. But I've to thank your kindness. Not kindness - you do have an eye, and skill for sands > But you've got me in suspense: shall we see some picture >from the middle of nowhereland? This one? <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/PAW-2009-Old+Postcard-1090397.jpg.html> For fun of course Amitiés Philippe > Mes amitiés, > Marc > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: AMARD philippe > To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:18 PM > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Skies and seas > > > Hi Marc, > > your sands - I must have already written this to you - >would have made Lucien Clergue proud to have shot. In any >case, I wish I had. > Fascinating photos they are. Thanks for re-posting the >link. > Best from the middle of nowhereland. > Amitiés > Philippe > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:10:20 +0200 > "Marc Dufour" wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > > >First of all, thanks for looking, and have a time, > >commenting these ones. > > > > Truthfully, I couldn't opine if are better the first > >ones or the second set. > > Both respond to different views, different ways to > >approach the landscape/subject, whathever that is. > > The first one: obvious, easier, and often, more > >spectacular. > > The second one: not so clear. It can seem so, but >brings > >together one a couple of basic elements, in an almost > >naked composition, and lets the spectator himself to >go > >into his own perception. > > Sometimes, less is more. > > > > Each one has his own filters and makes his own >choices. > >For an example, one of the series -never finished- I'm > >reasonably satisfied (why deny it ;-) is this one: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Sands/ > > .. however, I'm aware few people enjoy it, even here. > >They are even pictures without any sense, nor credit, >for > >many people. > > And other photographs, I'm not especially proud, > >received their applauses. > > > > I coudn't decide between these pictures, Ted, nor > >respond to your question about my 10 best ever >seascape > >photographs: I hope they still are waiting for me ! > > It's not a competition, even with myself. But I'm >really > >grateful you make me thinking a little about it ! > > Cheers, > > Marc > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Ted Grant > > To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 4:10 PM > > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Skies and seas > > > > > > Marc showed: > > > > Subject: [LRflex] Skies and seas > > > > >>>I never get bored, watching the sea horizon > > > > >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Seascapes/L1020578.jpg.html > > > > >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Seascapes/L1020572.jpg.html > > > > > > > > Hi Marc, > > > > The first selection are eye poppers, beautiful with >the > >gulls in flight, highlights sparkling putting life in >the > >photographs. Each a wall hanging piece of art. > > > > > > > > >>>... although sometimes it seems almost an abstract > >(or maybe, because of it) > > > > >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Seascapes/L1020359.jpg.html > > > > >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Seascapes/L1020362.jpg.html > > > > > > > > But these two, even as abstracts appear to fall way > >short of the high quality of the others. By the same > >token it's always "to each his own" in how we look or > >re-act to our own photography. One persons opinion >maybe > >salt, another's sugar. But basically it comes down to > >asking the question and how you re-act in your gut. > >Followed by "if in doubt. OUT!" Or of course. " IN!" > > > > > > > > Ask yourself this small question: "Do these two rank > >as two of your all time 10 best ever seascape > >photographs?" Answer that, then do what you have to >do. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > ted > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.50/2051 - > >Release Date: 04/09/09 19:01:00 > > > > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: >http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: >//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/