[LRflex] Re: Skies and seas and nowhereland

  • From: "Marc Dufour" <foto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:59:06 +0200

A sixties postcard colour treatment ? Nowhereneverland, you said?
Thanks for sharing this while of fun.
Amitiés,
Marc

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: AMARD philippe 
  To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 12:17 PM
  Subject: [LRflex] Re: Skies and seas and nowhereland 



  On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:32:26 +0200
  "Marc Dufour" wrote:
  > Hi Philippe,
  > 
  > Don't make me blush, mon ami !
  > I'm pretty sure a good "sand" of mines is like hundreds 
  >ruled out by LC. But I've to thank your kindness.

  Not kindness - you do have an eye, and skill for sands

  > But you've got me in suspense: shall we see some picture 
  >from the middle of nowhereland?

  This one?
  
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/PAW-2009-Old+Postcard-1090397.jpg.html>

  For fun of course
  Amitiés
  Philippe



  > Mes amitiés,
  > Marc 
  > 
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: AMARD philippe 
  > To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:18 PM
  > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Skies and seas
  > 
  > 
  > Hi Marc,
  > 
  > your sands - I must have already written this to you - 
  >would have made Lucien Clergue proud to have shot. In any 
  >case, I wish I had.
  > Fascinating photos they are. Thanks for re-posting the 
  >link.
  > Best from the middle of nowhereland.
  > Amitiés
  > Philippe
  > 
  > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:10:20 +0200
  > "Marc Dufour" wrote:
  > > Hi Ted,
  > > 
  > >First of all, thanks for looking, and have a time, 
  > >commenting these ones.
  > > 
  > > Truthfully, I couldn't opine if are better the first 
  > >ones or the second set.
  > > Both respond to different views, different ways to 
  > >approach the landscape/subject, whathever that is. 
  > > The first one: obvious, easier, and often, more 
  > >spectacular.
  > > The second one: not so clear. It can seem so, but 
  >brings 
  > >together one a couple of basic elements, in an almost 
  > >naked composition, and lets the spectator himself to 
  >go 
  > >into his own perception.
  > > Sometimes, less is more.
  > > 
  > > Each one has his own filters and makes his own 
  >choices. 
  > >For an example, one of the series -never finished- I'm 
  > >reasonably satisfied (why deny it ;-) is this one:
  > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Sands/ 
  > > .. however, I'm aware few people enjoy it, even here. 
  > >They are even pictures without any sense, nor credit, 
  >for 
  > >many people.
  > > And other photographs, I'm not especially proud, 
  > >received their applauses.
  > > 
  > > I coudn't decide between these pictures, Ted, nor 
  > >respond to your question about my 10 best ever 
  >seascape 
  > >photographs: I hope they still are waiting for me ! 
  > > It's not a competition, even with myself. But I'm 
  >really 
  > >grateful you make me thinking a little about it !
  > > Cheers,
  > > Marc
  > > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > > From: Ted Grant 
  > > To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 4:10 PM
  > > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Skies and seas
  > > 
  > > 
  > > Marc showed:
  > > 
  > > Subject: [LRflex] Skies and seas
  > > 
  > > >>>I never get bored, watching the sea horizon
  > > 
  > > 
  >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Seascapes/L1020578.jpg.html
  > > 
  > > 
  >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Seascapes/L1020572.jpg.html
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > Hi Marc,
  > > 
  > > The first selection are eye poppers, beautiful with 
  >the 
  > >gulls in flight, highlights sparkling putting life in 
  >the 
  > >photographs. Each a wall hanging piece of art.
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > >>>... although sometimes it seems almost an abstract 
  > >(or maybe, because of it)
  > > 
  > > 
  >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Seascapes/L1020359.jpg.html
  > > 
  > > 
  >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Marc/Seascapes/L1020362.jpg.html
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > But these two, even as abstracts appear to fall way 
  > >short of the high quality of the others. By the same 
  > >token it's always "to each his own" in how we look or 
  > >re-act to our own photography. One persons opinion 
  >maybe 
  > >salt, another's sugar. But basically it comes down to 
  > >asking the question and how you re-act in your gut. 
  > >Followed by "if in doubt. OUT!" Or of course. " IN!" 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > Ask yourself this small question: "Do these two rank 
  > >as two of your all time 10 best ever seascape 
  > >photographs?" Answer that, then do what you have to 
  >do.
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > Cheers,
  > > 
  > > ted
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > No virus found in this incoming message.
  > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  > > Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.50/2051 - 
  > >Release Date: 04/09/09 19:01:00
  > > 
  > 
  > 
  > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: 
  >http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: 
  >//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/


  ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: 
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: 
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: