Jerry: Appreciate the feed back. Do you know...or does anyone...if a Raw file will be similar size in PS or another Raw ( NEF ) file editing program? I have heard from others about the mega memory that Capture demands....indeed, Nikon Capture is being replaced with another program. I am not sure if the replacement is as "memory hungry". Elliot ----- Original Message ----- From: "jerry harwood" <jerry.harwood@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 2:22 PM Subject: [LRflex] Re: RAW vs JPEG (was More from Alaska) - slightly OT > Alex; regarding Nikons and RAW- I use a Digilux 2, and a D70; NEF ( > Nikon Electronic Format) is OK to use, and once you have tried it a > couple of times is fairly straight forward. What you must do, is to set > your image size that you are going to print to, FIRST, otherwise you > will end up in total frustration like I did, until I set the size > first, in the little box to the right of the image screen. Another tip, > is to open up all the boxes so that you can see what you have got, and > then eliminate those that you don't need. All you have to do is to drag > and drop the image onto the Nikon capture screen, and it will open very > quickly. As to using the RAW mode with the Digilux 2, I just don't > bother ! But, expect to get ENORMOUS file sizes from the Nikon- a 10X8 > print will finish up as a 90 MB file, so be warned ! regards Jerry > harwood. > On 5 Jul 2006, at 23:13, Alex Hurst wrote: > >> Elliot wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the great tutoring !! >> >> >> I concur, having just succumbed to a Nikon D200 body myself on the >> basis that it'll mount almost all of my many MF Nikkors (wildly OT). >> DY makes the pros of RAW a lot clearer. >> >>> Still means that there must be computer >>> time with Photoshop or another program...I haven't tried RAW on the >>> Nikon >>> yet. As you probably know, their RAW files are some sort of >>> proprietary NEF >>> files. I know such files can be opened in Nikon Capture and other >>> programs >>> that can deal with NEF. One then transfer the files into Photoshop. >>> One >>> must be a computer wizard to do certain digital work! >>> >> >> For those seeking ultimate quality, the RAW route certainly makes a >> lot of sense at the cost of a considerable amount of extra work. >> OTOH, if your camera can produce a perfectly good 10Mb JPEG, it's >> unlikely that you'll see much difference in quality up to the size of >> an A4 print, which is my printer maximum anyway. And for publishing >> on the Net at 90 dpi, I doubt you could tell the difference between a >> large JPEG and RAW. >> >> It also means that I can import directly into iPhoto (Mac), and make >> any necessary adjustments in PS - which you can tell iPhoto is your >> program of choice. There's a lot to be said for working with just a >> couple of programs you know backwards. I've just started on the task >> of processing 300 shots from a IIIf and a Nikon F4 from my recent >> trip to Italy. My semi-digital compromise of telling my processor >> 'dev and CD' has made this a lot quicker and a great deal easier. >> Anything really outstanding, I will, of course, scan from the neg. >> >> Best >> >> Alex >> -- >> Alex & Carmel Hurst >> Waterfall >> Near Cork >> Ireland >> >> Tel: +353 21 454 3328 >> Mobile: +353 87 245 7048 >> Work: +353 21 427 0907 >> email: corkflor@xxxxxx >> Home Pages: http://www.iol.ie/~corkflor >> ------ >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: >> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >> Archives are at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ >> > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/