[LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- From: mehrdad <msadat@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:09:28 -0700
i think the bigger the ccd, the hard it is for the IS to work, much
bigger apparatus needed
to move a bigger sensor.
PS
while @ pma last year i saw how it works in the pentax booth
On 10/17/07, William Abbott <wbabbott3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 6:42 PM, David Young wrote:
> "... A sensor perhaps larger than full frame?"
>
> David,
>
> That would allow the sensor to be moved relative to the image for image
> stabilization. Think about it.
>
> Best,
>
> Bill
>
--
-------------------------------------
regards, mehrdad
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)
- » [LRflex] Re: R-10, M and X camera Info (long)