Aram, Number two is the memory shot, encapsulating her for everyone, as long as there is anyone who can remember her. Thanks, Bill On Jul 29, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Aram Langhans wrote: > Dug out the 50/1.2 Nikon and strapped in on the D7000 for these. They were > shot at 1.2, and 2 respectfully. The f-stop does not record accurately on > the D7000 for this lens for some reason. The lowest that will show up is 2.0 > and when stopping down, it always shows the next smallest f-stop, so 2.0 > shows as 2.8, 2.8 shows as 4.0, etc. Not sure if that can be adjusted. > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/su12/m/untitled-3135.jpg.html > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/su12/m/untitled-3130.jpg.html > > Vanishing thin depth of field at 1.2. Been a while since I tried this lens as > my rate of accurately focused shots indoors was dismal, but there was enough > light coming through the window at Kidd Valley I think I got the focus pretty > good. > > comments and criticism welcome. View large. > > Aram > > Aram Langhans > (Semi) Retired (retarded?) Science Teacher > & Unemployed photographer > > “The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself > would ever have dared dream.” James D. Watson