--- Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi David, > autofocus module: isn't this how Canon started it > all in the 8O's? > I can still see the huge device on some lenses. > > Might be fun though. > Cheers > Phileicangemixitall > > > > David Young wrote: > > >At 29/01/2007, you wrote: > > > > > >>It will be a hard job David, > >>there are quite a few Steven K Lees, Stephen K > Lees, Steve K Lees, SK > >>Lees S.K. Lees. > >>Many of them to do with the audio and computer > industry (digital > >>watermarking) and even a technical and scientific > law specialist of the > >>same name. > >>Best of luck, I couldn't find anything definitive. > >>Cheers > >>Douglas > >> > >> > > > > > >G'Mornin' Douglas! > > > >Heck... if you leave out the "K", you get a > gazillion of > >'em! Obviously a very popular name. > > > >I don't *really* think that the Steven K Lee in the > patent is "our" > >Steven K. Lee, but the coincidence of an autofocus > system and his now > >leading a firm that is possibly headed in the AF > direction, seemed > >just too good to be true! > > > >That being said, if Leica were to go to AF, this > would be an > >interesting way to go about it. They might even be > able to do it > >with existing lenses. Certainly, the Contax N > method (the only other > >commercialized method for putting AF "in the > camera") didn't seem to > >be (a) reliable or (b) commercially successful. > > > >As Tom Schofield said: > > > > > > > >>Sounds like the idea is that the Modular lens > system > >>Leica has now for 280 2.8 and larger lenses, could > >>potentially be sold for N, C, Sony, Pentax, etc. > by > >>selling the focusing modules made for each > respective > >>camera system, Like a very sophisticated adapatall > >>mount. > >> > >> > > > >What a great way to make a set of lenses, which are > magnificent but > >priced only for the pros, much more marketable! > > > >For smaller lenses, it might be possible to build > the AF "focusing > >module", while using Leica's existing lens designs > in new lens heads > >to fit. The machining would all be new, but the > optical stuff would > >stay the same... a very low cost way to provide AF > in new lenses > >while maintaining mount compatibility with our > existing MF lenses. > > > >I wonder if Leica have even seen this idea? > > > >This is almost as good as being an "armchair > quarterback"! ;-) > > > >Cheers! > > > > > > > > > >--- > > > >David Young, > >Logan Lake, CANADA > > > >Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/ > >Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt > > > > > > > > > >------ > >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > >Archives are at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > > > > > > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/