[LRflex] Re: PAW: Phx 40th - www
- From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@xxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:40:46 -0700
On Oct 14, 2008, at 2:34 PM, Philippe AMARD wrote:
Agreed Ted - looks much crisper when seen in Lightroom and not yet
turned into a JPEG. Yet, you are right as to "too dark" for one, and
also as to the framing. I guess the upper left corner is the most
interesting part, but not the sharpest in focus. The web was
destroyed by a bird a couple of minutes later, never to be seen
again ... But I'll try again
Thahnks for your nice endeavour to rescue this one and your kind
support.
Keep shooting Ted, in all weathers.
I took a crack at it...
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/paw2008/pa_001.jpg.html
Steve
Amitiés de Metz
Philippe
Ted Grant wrote:
Philippe Amard showed:
Subject: [LRflex] PAW: Phx 40th - www
Last week's PAW is up :
http://tinyurl.com/3m7spw<<<<<<<<
Hi Philippe,
This dew drop spider web is intriguing. But I don’t think the
screen, maybe mine, doesn’t do it justice for the beauty that’s here.
Maybe it’s a touch on the dark side? Or maybe a tighter frame on a
tighter group of threads and drops? Or it’s because it’s against a
dark back ground and the dew drops aren’t sparkly as they should
be? So many questions when there seem so many possibilities.
This will be one for interesting responses just to see what others
think on how “it could be saved? More interesting? Printed it
differently? Or a dozen more answers?”
I like shooting dew drop spider webs as we have a bunch here
during late September and through out October early in the morning
before the sun warms the atmosphere and they disappear.
I like this shot very much and yet I can’t put a finger on it to
really make it work as I think it should.
Maybe others?
ted
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
