[LRflex] Re: Opinions on 21-35mm zoom
- From: Steve Barbour <steve.barbour@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:54:38 -0700
On Oct 7, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Chris L wrote:
----- Original Message ----
From: Steve Barbour <steve.barbour@xxxxxxxxx>
if this is in part to replace the 19mm II my best, simplest
advice... save your money.
And if you prefer to keep it light, leave the 35 at home....
But if you insist on buying the 21-35 VE, write to me off list, I
likely can make you a screaming deal on a mint one....
Steve
________________________________________________________
Thanks Steve,
Will meditate on your advice and offer....
I have often considered and even tried using a super-wide (18-21mm,
depending on system) as my only wide. Keep in mind that I don't use
a 50mm, so the next longest lens will be a 90mm (or close, depending
on the system).
Unfortunately I missed a "normal" FL, which for me is 35mm.
I can see where this is going: The 21-35mm probably isn't as good as
the better primes it could replace and the question is how much do I
want to pay for a (realtively) small weight reduction.
On the plus side, there are the zoom advantages of framing and the
availability of a nice FL of around 24mm (which I don't have in
Leica R, and normally leave at home in other systems).
One original question remains: Are there 21-35mm without ROM?
I will look for mine...
Steve
Chris
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
