[LRflex] Re: Olympus and Leica

  • From: Douglas Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:12:57 -0700

Keep looking Jerry.  My name has nothing to do with it.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


On Apr 27, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:

> Doug,
>
> Very simply, from the B&H website!  An R9 kit with cheap 35-70mm
> lens is $ 4300. A DMR is $6000.  Together they add up to 10 kilobucks
> plus.  Don't they?  Then ya gotta add add shipping or sales tax. So 
> show
> me where one could buy a new camera, lens and digi-back for under
> 10 kilobux.
>
> I hope you realize that ya gotta have a lens, camera and a digital 
> back.
>
> You may be able to find a better deal because you are a "name" 
> photographer,
> but I am not.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> Douglas Herr wrote:
>
>> Jerry, where do you get the $10,000 plus figure?
>>
>> The 4/3 cameras are not in the same league as the Canon 1D-series,
>> Leica R9/DMR, or Nikon D2x because they have a smaller, noisier 
>> sensor.
>>
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>
>> On Apr 27, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
>>
>>> PJQ,
>>>
>>> Stop obfuscating like a politician! Stick to answering the question!
>>>
>>> I want to compare a $10,000 PLUS camera with the new Leica
>>> lensed Panasonic DSLR.  Don't bring up red herrings such as
>>> Canon or Olympus hybrids.  Stick to the subject, or do not answer
>>> at all. In other words, do not be like a politician.
>>>
>>> Jerry
>>>
>>> Peter.Quick@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>> Xavier,
>>>> Do you mean that this new Leica-lensed DSLR will compete with
>>>> the $10,000 DMR/ Leica R9 combination?
>>>>
>>>> What are feelings about this?
>>>>
>>>> Jerry
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jerry,
>>>> The Panasonic DSLR is not in the same league as the DMR (R8 or R9),
>>>> not
>>>> even near the parking lot of the ball game (my opinion, held out as 
>>>> a
>>>> target to be shot down, but they're very different beasties - only
>>>> thing
>>>> in common - they're digital cameras). The Leica lens is a different
>>>> story.
>>>>
>>>>> From the Panasonic side of things, the camera will compete with sub
>>>>> $1500
>>>> Olympus offerings (E330, E500).
>>>> The Panasonic camera doesn't offer anything new or outstanding and
>>>> will
>>>> compete on looks (it becomes a fashion thing).
>>>>
>>>> BUT!  It's very great/wonderful/fantastic to see the 4Thirds 
>>>> standard
>>>> moving and not fizzling out.
>>>>
>>>> Oly E owners are lusting over the lens already, and my dusty crystal
>>>> ball
>>>> says it'll be more expensive than it's Oly or Sigma equivalents.
>>>> There'll be a kit deal - which makes the lens seem cheaper - but if
>>>> you
>>>> already own an E body, (especially an E1) you probably can't see
>>>> value in
>>>> the Pana body).
>>>>
>>>> *IF*  the Leica lens turns out sharper than an Oly "Pro" digital, 
>>>> the
>>>> forum lusting in 4Thirds land is justified and it will be a
>>>> spectacular
>>>> piece of glass.
>>>>
>>>> Regs,
>>>> PJQ
>>>>
>>>> PS. Please ignore the corporate legal mumbo-jumb of this 
>>>> non-removable
>>>> footer...
>>>>
>>>> This is an email from Corrs Chambers Westgarth or Corrs Support
>>>> Services Pty Ltd.  The email and any attachments may be 
>>>> confidential,
>>>> legally privileged and/or subject to copyright.  If you are not the
>>>> intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information
>>>> contained in this e-mail.  If you have received this email in error,
>>>> please notify us immediately and delete the email and all copies.  
>>>> We
>>>> do not guarantee that this email and any attachments are free from
>>>> virus or other errors.  We will not be responsible for loss or 
>>>> damage
>>>> resulting (either directly or indirectly) from any such virus or
>>>> error. We will only be responsible for a change to a document if we
>>>> made the change.  The content of and opinions expressed in
>>>> non-business emails are not necessarily ours.
>>>> If this is a commercial electronic message within the meaning of the
>>>> Spam Act, you may indicate that you do not wish to receive any
>>>> further commercial electronic messages from us by sending an email 
>>>> to
>>>> mailto:privacy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> ------
>>>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>>>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>>>> Archives are at:
>>>>     //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/326 - Release Date:
>>>> 04/27/2006
>>>
>>> ------
>>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>>> Archives are at:
>>>     //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>> Archives are at:
>>     //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/326 - Release Date: 
>> 04/27/2006
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
>     //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: