Excellent Observation Rob, I think you maybe are onto something with your comment about the 4/3 aspect ratio having somehow subliminally pushed you into getting that Oly E3. As part of a 'discipline' exercise my first year in college, I worked very hard to shoot and print without cropping my images (35mm only at that point) and in retrospect I believe that it pushed into my photography a distinct preference for the non-standard proportions of the dang 35mm frame! As I went on to explore 6x6 and 4x5 photography, those image frames always felt 'odd' to me and was a difficult intellectual exercise to make work well as print proportions (in their uncropped state). Richard in Michigan ps: how goes it with the E3 now that you've begun 'reading the manual'? ________________________________ From: Robert Lilley <speyerdom@xxxxxxx> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Fri, September 3, 2010 3:50:28 PM Subject: [LRflex] Re: Observations on digital shooting More Observations on digital shooting. I've been getting this strange sensation looking through the viewfinder of my new Olympus E-3. Sort of deja vu. Last night it came to me. I shoot a lot of 9x12cm on my Toyo 45A view and Voightlander Bergheil folder. It is the same ratio - four thirds! I just happen to like the 9x12cm format better than 4x5inch. Its all coming together and I feel at home now -=sigh=-. Although I do feel sort of stupid, should have picked this up from the beginning. Perhaps it is one of those subliminal things. Now that I think about it, I've never really been happy with 35mm or 6x6cm. I wonder if folks have a certain ratio they prefer viewing the world about them and they just gravitate to that format without even knowing why? Rob ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/