At 24/04/2007, you wrote: >I just purchased the best flat panel monitor I could afford or find >locally. Samsung 226BW with a 3000:1 contrast range. Things look quite >nice, but slightly off. I used an old Spyder (Not version 2) on it last >night many times and it never worked will. The light grays have a very >noticeable pink or magenta tint to them. I followed the instructions to >the letter and then tried deviating from them with various monitor >settings and they went from bad to worse. > >Any hints would be greatly appreciated. Does the Spyder 2 perform >better? The reviews say it is a bit better, but most of the reviews I >have read say the original is pretty good, too. I know it worked quite >well on my CRT monitor. I am tempted to take this back and stick to my >old monitor, but I do like the 22" wide view. I can fit lots of stuff >on my screen. The 3000:1 contrast ratio really shows the details in the >shadows w/o blowing out the highlights. I just want them to be an >accurate representation of what I print. > >Aram Hi Aram! I cannot say anything about the Spyder, nor the Spyder 2, as I've not used them. I have used, and continue to use, the Monaco Optix XR (which is, I believe, now discontinued). I have a 19" Acer LCD Screen, and the Monaco unit works well with it. I have found the Monaco simple to use and utterly accurate. Colours and details I see on my screen are exactly what I get, when I see the prints made by my local lab. Please, keep us informed as to what you do. Enquiring minds want to know! Good Luck! --- David Young, Logan Lake, CANADA Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/ Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4 ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/