[LRflex] Re: No subject

  • From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:29:01 +0200

May I ask what EMP stands for , please.
I really DK ;-)
Philippe in Metz

Le 31 mars 10 à 20:09, Charlie Falke a écrit :

>
> On 3/31/2010 2:00 PM, David Simms wrote:
>> Isn't this the "world after the EMP" , Charlie?
>> Hmmm, come to think of it, if that were the case it wouldn't be a  
>> digital image, would it?
>> Dave
>>
>>
> David,
>    It does have kind of Mad Max look to it, doesn't it.
> (I just found out that they shot that near Alice Springs, BTW)
>    It looked more like a windstorm, but that wouldn't account for the
> graffiti.  I haven't thought about EMP a lot, commercial stuff isn't
> required to comply, although most of what we do for lightning helps.
>    Off the top of my head, EMP strong enough to fritz
> non-volatile memory in a camera that's turned off might be
> accompanied by radiation strong enough to fog film.
> I hope none of is ever exposed to either.
>
> -- 
>  Charlie Falke                                        _____      /\
>                                                  | __/\__/------/__)
>                                                  |(____\/_________/
>  "One test result is worth                       |    |/        `o
>    one thousand expert opinions" - Wernher Von Braun  0  N4003M
>  "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Albert Einstein
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: