May I ask what EMP stands for , please. I really DK ;-) Philippe in Metz Le 31 mars 10 à 20:09, Charlie Falke a écrit : > > On 3/31/2010 2:00 PM, David Simms wrote: >> Isn't this the "world after the EMP" , Charlie? >> Hmmm, come to think of it, if that were the case it wouldn't be a >> digital image, would it? >> Dave >> >> > David, > It does have kind of Mad Max look to it, doesn't it. > (I just found out that they shot that near Alice Springs, BTW) > It looked more like a windstorm, but that wouldn't account for the > graffiti. I haven't thought about EMP a lot, commercial stuff isn't > required to comply, although most of what we do for lightning helps. > Off the top of my head, EMP strong enough to fritz > non-volatile memory in a camera that's turned off might be > accompanied by radiation strong enough to fog film. > I hope none of is ever exposed to either. > > -- > Charlie Falke _____ /\ > | __/\__/------/__) > |(____\/_________/ > "One test result is worth | |/ `o > one thousand expert opinions" - Wernher Von Braun 0 N4003M > "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Albert Einstein > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/