Happy Holidays and Happy New Year to all! I have been reading a lot of posts regarding digital alternatives on this list, and since I don't want to hold my breath any longer for a dR10 or what have you, I am considering the adaptive road. This is where the new camera comes in. Now I don't have much experience in the digital domain since its inception. I had a Minolta 7 and now a Canon A570is (hardly hard core digital equipment). The thing is I cannot seem to get away from Leica glass whether it's M or R. I do also use my Contax or Nikon AF system once in a while (depending on event or use). But it's the glass that has kept me with Leica this long with film. Now, I have read people on this list use Olympus/Panasonic 4/3 system or the Canon system. All the photos look great, but I would probably be able to live with a 1.6x factor compared to a 2.0x factor. I only, for a moment, thought about the M8, but I seem to like the SLR more so than the rangefinder (though it depends on the event or use again). I would think some of you would have tried the available routes to get to where you're at now, so I just want to draw on a little bit on your experiences. My starter route is the Canon XSi. I don't think the screen is user exchangeable as with the more pro like models. Was this a deal breaker for your decision to settle on the system/rig you now use? Is it difficult to focus without a split screen? The Catz Eye screen seems to be recommended by most folks. David, you seem to be set on your Olympus E3 system and Doug has been using a DMR for his wildlife photos. It seems the stop down metering caused you to either go dedicated digital with another system or to succumb to a digital R body. I take it there's no in between for you? Sorry for the long post after lurking all this time. Take care all, Gary E ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/