[LRflex] Re: My .02 worth - Live View???

  • From: David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:32:23 -0700

Aram pondered:

>I must be confused.  What is the big deal about "live view"?  Doesn't an SLR
>have "live view" as we look through the viewfinder.  True, the viewfinder
>goes black when we take the photo but I challenge anyone to determine if a
>perso blinked a fraction of a sceond before you took the photo, or during
>the expousre, or a fraction of a second after?  With my TLR Rollei, it has
>live view and I can not make that determination.  Hey, with digital I can
>chimp and see if they blinked.
>
>So, what am I missing about this live view thing?  Seems like a bunch of
>hype to me with my present understanding.
>
>Aram


Hi Aram!

Yes, I agree with you.  However, Howard Cummer is a big fan of "live 
view".  I'm not sure where Xavier and Philippe stand, on the issue.

Good photographic practice dictates we hold our cameras braced 
against our cheeks and foreheads, with our arms tucked in, to 
minimize camera shake.   What we should never do is hold our cameras 
at arms length, while shooting.  Yet, this is what the users of small 
P&S models do.  Such cameras have/had such poor finders that people 
adopted this method of "Live View" framing, as the camera back LCDs 
are much larger/clearer than their camera's finders.

When the P&S makers discovered this, they solved the problem, in many 
cases, by no longer making finders, at all!  (It is this "at arms 
length" practice which forced the makers to adopt some sort of IS in 
their P&S cameras, as well!)

"Live View" simply makes the image available on the LCD for 
framing.  This is possible in two ways....

1) You can open the shutter, and use the camera's sensor to provide 
the image.  This means the mirror is up, and thus AF is not available 
in this mode.  To take the shot, the shutter is closed, the sensor 
cleared and then the shutter is opened, once more.  When the shutter 
closes, the mirror is lowered, as normal.

2) the maker can place a second sensor in the finder, thus allowing 
"live view" on the LCD with the  mirror down and enabling AF at the 
same time.  However, this requires siphoning more light from the 
finder to the sensor, making the finder that much dimmer.

Harold maintains that he can neither see nor measure any difference 
in brightness of the finders of his PanaLeica L1 (method 1) and his 
Oly (method 2).  Still, I am, like Doug, a huge fan of bright 
finders, and would not want any feature which dims the finder - even 
if only marginally.

I can see having "live view" via method 1, as it does not affect the 
finder, and could be useful for macro and other tripod work, where 
you can watch the screen and perform manual focusing. To me, LV, via 
method 2 only encourages bad photographic practice.

The PanaLeica L1 and Leica D3 have LV via mode 1, as does (it is 
rumoured)  the coming Canon 40d. In fact, mode 1 LV could be easily 
implemented on just about any dSLR (even the R8/9 + DMR) via a 
programming update (though any DMR update is looking like a faint 
hope, at this point), as the mirror's are fired and held up under 
software control.  The only drawback is that holding the mirror up 
consumes a disproportionate amount of batter power.  But, for the odd 
time you'd use it, I can see it being very handy.

A final thought...

I've been taking some photos on a borrowed Kodak (Oh, how the mighty 
have fallen!) Easy-Share, which, like most P&S cameras, has LV and a 
lousy finder.  Indoors, on a tripod, LV was a delight for framing the 
shots seen at http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/Minolta.htm .  In fact the 
little 6mp Kodak acquitted itself very well.  (It's terrible shutter 
lag is not important on the tripod, where I use the ST as it has no 
cable release.)

Yesterday, I tried to use the same camera, to photograph Rose's "new" 
1992 truck, now on the road.  Using LV in bright sunlight was an 
almost impossibility... though the photos themselves were OK.

Does it make more sense, now?

Cheers!
---

David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA

Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: