[LRflex] Re: More speculation on the direction of the R10.
- From: phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:11:19 +0200
Thanks,
all the more so as you give the main info and spare me the time to find th=
at back issue.
Yours
Phil...x
----Message d'origine----
>De: Juan Gea-Banacloche <banacloj=40mac.com>
>Sujet: =5BLRflex=5D Re: More speculation on the direction of the R10.
>Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 19:57:11 -0400
>A: leicareflex=40freelists.org
>
>
>On May 7, 2007, at 2:06 PM, phamard=40numericable.fr wrote:
>
>> Juan wrote : =3D
>>
>>> In the French photo magazine Chasseur D' Images they compared the =3D
>>
>>> Leica 14-50 with the Olympus equivalent on the L1. They were =
>>> similar =3D
>>
>>> at every f-stop *except* wide open, where the Leica trumped the =3D
>>
>>> Olympus. They are pursuing the same strategy with the 25mm =
>>> Summilux...
>>>
>>
>> Hi Juan which month was it published, I must have missed it.
>> Thaks in anticipation
>> Yours
>> Phil...x
>>
>October 2006, issue =23 287. I am checking the test now as I write, =
>and in truth the Leica Lens was better overall except at the14mm =
>focal length (the comparison is with the =22pro=22 Zuiko 14-54mm, not =
>with the 14-45mm kit lens), with a likely noticeable difference at 32 =
>and 50mm, and huge difference at f:2.8 and f:4.
>
>At f:5.6 and f:8 they look the same. Chromatic aberration, distortion =
>and vignetting were excellent in both, but slightly better in the Zuiko.
>
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/=7Etelyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Noos, votre bureau virtuel sur Internet : Mail...
Web : webmail.noos.fr
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
