On Feb 15, 2011, at 12:51 PM, David Young wrote: > Hi Bill! > > In a message dated 15/02/2011, William B. Abbott III said ... > >> That's a great shot. > > Thanks! :-) > >> You're really getting the hang of it. All night long last >> night I drifted in and out of sleep searching my mind for places where I can >> get a safe, long shot of speeding cars! I'm hooked. > > You don't need a fast moving subject ... just a moving subject. In fact, > in my limited experience, the faster they are, and the closer you are, the > harder it is! That's my sense too after only a few days of experience. > > (Perhaps it's only because my nearly 65 yr. old body doesn't twist quite > like it used to!) You youngsters have it made. Swiveling my 80 year old bod takes some doing but I'm learning with cars on a nearby road, The cars are hitting 50 mph or so as they go by and are maybe 10-15 meters away. I got pretty good results today with 1/30 sec at f22, better than 1/60 for me. Being right handed, I seem to do better with cars going by from right to left; maybe it shouldn't matter but it has for me so far. Here's a sample from my R9/DMR: http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/wbabbott3/swishy_001/L1130252.jpg.html > I notice that my best shots, of bikes moving 80 to 100kph, is around 1/40th > to 1/60th of a second. For slower subjects, you may need an even slower > speed. Remember ... f22 is your friend! > > Do stand back a bit.... I spotted this idiot (on the right) trying to get > "action" shots with a w/a lens... and he came within inches of being > clipped by the bikes, several times. It was only by the skill of the > riders that he was spared, and after a short time, he was "invited" to > leave! Trust me, I'm a way back kinda guy! > > http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Stake_21.html All the best, Bill ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/