[LRflex] Re: More Mirrorless Leica R Camera Thoughts and Link

  • From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:09:44 +0200

This is the part I hate most - as in nearly all "modern" cameras BTW
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonyslta55/images/controlsleft.jpg

Philippe, left handed and analog controls addict ;-)

Le 8 sept. 10 à 19:04, Richard Ward a écrit :

>
> Hello All,
>    further notes and thoughts on what I previously posted regarding a
> 'Mirrorless' Leica Camera for providing a 'R' Solution. Some of the  
> 'rumor'
> regarding this "camera" I came across talked about it being  
> Autofocus, but NOT
> in the lens or lenses. Rather it does so by using a sensor shift  
> design to
> achieve autofocus - presumably autofocusing with R lenses, too -  
> which gives
> Leica an OUT card on having to design and build Autofocus lenses for  
> it. If the
> 'camera' is a derivative of the 'nex' lineup this could give them an  
> Autofocus M
> camera option as well because if it's based on the 'Nex' that  
> camera's lens
> flange spec is rather minuscule.
>    In my last email I noted a 'cool' Sony Alpha camera that recently  
> came out
> "http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonyslta55/"; which has an 'slr'  
> feel and look
> to it's design, but the viewfinder is all Digital. Frankly, hi- 
> resolution LCD's
> have come a long way and it's starting to win converts in the camera  
> field -
> there have been some interesting "I didn't think I'd like it, but  
> do' comments
> on the CVUG mailing lists regarding Micro Four Thirds Digital  
> Viewfinders. Not
> saying a 'real' mirror viewfinders doesn't have advantages, but  
> these digital
> ones bring special abilities of their own and are closing the gaps  
> they have
> with optical ones with each new generation.
>
>   I think that with Leica sidelining it's FourThirds' camera and  
> lens efforts,
> they can re-enter that market segment with a Leica Only effort which  
> keeps their
> Cachet of terrific Manual Focus lenses but retains AF for the masses  
> via sensor
> shift. Besides: when hasn't Leica loved delicate highly engineered  
> focusing
> equipment! :-) Anyone here seen the specifications, tolerances, and  
> blueprints,
> for Rangefinder Systems. Cams, prisms, mirrors, levers, gears, etc  
> etc etc the
> miracle isn't that it's precise - the miracle is that it works at  
> all! (Just a
> little Hyperbole to lighten the mood.)
>
> Whether 'Sony' is really working with Leica or not, who knows. If an
> announcement is made at/for Photokina, it's been beta tested in  
> somebodies hands
> and they aren't talking. NDA anyone? I'm just saying that the  
> underlying logic
> of sony having a microlens issue due to short lens flange spec's  
> makes sense and
> partnering with Leica on 'projects' to gain some of their  
> specialized knowledge
> on the problem also makes sense.
>
>
> Leica has never promised a good, a great, or a perfect 'R' solution,  
> but the
> undeclared premise is a solution they can make money with. A  
> mirrorless camera
> that can bayonet R lenses onto would work, especially Full Frame,  
> but if it can
> take M  lenses as well AND Auto Focus Them, too - it then becomes  
> economically
> viable across product cycles without restarting R lens production. I  
> also don't
> see with mirrorless cameras short-ass lens mounts an R lens adapter  
> 'Tube' (and
> it would be a tube) can't include a stop down mechanism. If Leica's  
> 'R' solution
> doesn't beat mount adapters for Canon/Nikon/Sony dSLR's on that  
> point: What's
> the Point In Ever Buying One? Leica will have killed their unit  
> volume to R
> buyers before they ever see one if they make the mistake of it not  
> having an
> auto stop down function.
>
> peace
> R. in Michigan
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> "There is a joy in taking photographs that will always be there, it  
> is the joy
> of looking, of capturing that fraction of a second, it is the  
> photographic shot,
> the intuitive shot..." (Henri Cartier-Bresson)
> ________________________________
>
>
> “No man hath given his child anything better than good manners.”
> - Prophet Muhammad (570-632)
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: