Le 7 sept. 10 à 16:57, Aram Langhans a écrit : > > Yep. 6x6 if full frame, 4x5 is full frame. They are all full frame > for > what they are designed for. > > However, if referring to Leica R glass, it should only be called > full frame > with 24x36. can't be MTF then ... ;-) Ph > > Aram > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 7:33 AM > To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Mirrorless Full frame to take R lenses with > adapter > >> >> Le 7 sept. 10 à 16:22, Aram Langhans a écrit : >> >>> a full frame m4/3 >> >> Some (I for one) might argue about this but all MTFs are full frame >> so >> long as you use MTF lenses on them ... >> (means you don't lose any of the image circle) >> >> If you (probably) mean 24x36mm aka FX in modern technie talk ;-) >> >> Then the encounter of the terms is surrealistic unless M stands for >> Mega ... :-) >> >> >> >> Bien cordialement >> Philippe >> NO ARCHIVE >> >> >> ------ >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: >> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ >> Archives are at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ >> > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/