[LRflex] Re: Mirrorless Full frame to take R lenses with adapter

  • From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:00:22 +0200

Le 7 sept. 10 à 16:57, Aram Langhans a écrit :

>
> Yep.  6x6 if full frame, 4x5 is full frame.  They are all full frame  
> for
> what they are designed for.
>
> However, if referring to Leica R glass, it should only be called  
> full frame
> with 24x36.

can't be MTF then ... ;-)

Ph

>
> Aram
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 7:33 AM
> To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Mirrorless Full frame to take R lenses with  
> adapter
>
>>
>> Le 7 sept. 10 à 16:22, Aram Langhans a écrit :
>>
>>> a full frame m4/3
>>
>> Some (I for one) might argue about this but all MTFs are full frame  
>> so
>> long as you use MTF lenses on them ...
>> (means you don't lose any of the image circle)
>>
>> If you (probably) mean 24x36mm aka FX in modern technie talk  ;-)
>>
>> Then the encounter of the terms is surrealistic  unless M stands for
>> Mega ... :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> Bien cordialement
>> Philippe
>> NO ARCHIVE
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>  http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> Archives are at:
>>   //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: