Ahrgh,
You know how to speak to me David!
Regards.
--------------------------------- Xavier F. BILLE Maisons-Alfort - France.
From: "David Young" <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [LRFlex] Was: While you are using Canon Now: M-F gear. Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:24:34 -0700
-------------------
Nothing wrong with M-F, Xavier!
However, the film costs are higher than 35mm and the choices are fewer. Resolution of even the best M-F lenses will not equal a good 35mm, but then they don't need to, as the magnification factor is much lower for a given size print.
My complaints with M-F is the cost (though used gear is becoming very, very reasonable) and the size/weight. An R8 w/motor and/or DM-R is bad enough!
Perhaps one day, when I'm feeling masochistic, I'll dig out my old Sept 35mm movie/still camera w/spring-wound motor. It takes low grade photos while building your muscles! iT Must weigh 4 kilos (almost 10 lbs)!
OTOH, maybe I'll stick with my Leicas (an occasionally, a Canon 20DWas with a Leica lens mounted!). :-)
Cheers!
David Young, Logan Lake, BC CANADA.
Personal Web-site at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/