[LRflex] Re: M8's IR Problem Exploited
- From: Richard Ward <ilovaussiesheps@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:30:03 -0400
Hi Frank!
I wasn't specifically 'arguing' with ya :-) but, rather attempting to give a
nice context to your good advice. Shooting IR with the M8 is surprisingly
straight forward considering it has been entirely designed for Visible Light
Image Making.
Query: I wonder if we've mentioned the Lenses focus IR light differently than
Visible Light?
Richard in Michigan
____________________________________
I don't know what your Problem Is,
but I bet it's Hard to Pronounce. :-)
____________________________________
On May 19, 2011, at 12:26 AM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No argument....
>
> I was worried at first... but the images I played with are pretty much spot
> on when set on auto....
>
> After all, you can always chimp to the perfect exposure ....
>
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I think setting the M8 to iso640 and Auto Exposure is a perfectly fine
> Starting Point for delving into the Joys of Infrared Imagery. The "but"
> being if it's done with the knowledge that it is a "Starting Point" and
> there isn't a technological requirement to use those specific settings.
>
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts: