[LRFlex] Re: Leicanon - 80-200 zoom
- From: "David Young" <telyt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:57:30 -0700
G'mornin' Ted & Douglas!
I must agree with you both.. The quality of Leica glass on the Canon
digi-bodies is truly amazing.
The 80~200 f/4 was my favourite lens on the R8 and continues to be on the 20D.
(The sad part is that it makes the Canon 17~85mm AF-IS lens that I came with
the 20D look much poorer than it probably is, in relation to most zooms around!)
For those who don't know Ted, I've had that privelege for a few years now, and
I've seen the prints he makes. To say they are stunning would be an
understatement!
Even those shot at high ISOs (which do exhibit more 'noise' and a little less
clarity than medium speed film) are hard to tell from similar sized, silver
prints made from negs.
I was a died-in-the-wool film user who'd "never go digital", until I started to
see the results Ted was getting with his LeiCanon. Evenually, I followed in
his path and, to be honest, I haven't had so much fun with photography for a
long time!
Cheers!
David.
-------------------
On 23/06/2005 at 8:24 AM Ted Grant wrote:
>Douglas Sharp offered:
>Subject: [LRFlex] Leicanon - Summicron 50 for Macro
>
>
>>>I am constantly amazed at the quality produced by
>> the combination of a 20D and Leica-R glass.<<<<
>
>Hi Douglas,
>There isn't any question about the amazing quality derived from R Leica
>lenses, on the 20D and I expect from other Canon digi cameras also.
>Certainly those lenses I've worked with more so than others for about 6
>months, 100mm macro 2.8 and in particular the 80-200 f4.0 zoom lens.
>
>The 80-200 is cutting at ASA100 as though I'm using super fine grain
>colour
>slide film. The smoothness of skin and colour shooting faces at 200mm,
>well
>OK some very attractive young model potential women, it's amazing. Not to
>forget edge sharpness of eye lashes and snap of highlights in the eyes.
>
>I have completely given up on discussing the constant babble of digi
>numbers
>of what it will and wont do! Waste of time quite simply because I'm
>looking
>at the end product on major enlargements and not the constant babble of
>nit
>picking numbers.
>
>Obviously numbers get some people all a twitter and turned on.
>
>Where I'm far more concerned in the end quality of the photograph
>reproduction than the constant number thing. So far making 13X19 prints on
>an EPSON 2200 it's creating drop dead prints with my "old colour lab
>people"
>whom I've paid a fortune to over ther years producing my colour printing
>and
>slide processing wondering what the hell I do! ;-) I show them and they
>don't believe it! Now isn't that much better than meaningless numbers
>unless
>yer a geekie kind a guy! ;-)
>
>As many of you know already, my answer as usual is.... "KISS!" keep it
>simple stupid, shoot away with no more thought than making good solid
>photographs while letting the camera do 99.9% of the worrying! Click.
>Print!
>Smile and feel good! :-)
>
>Nice photo and having fun without all the digi number BS!! :-) Have a nice
>LEICANON day! :-)
>
>ted
>
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
David Young,
Logan Lake, BC
CANADA.
Personal Web-site at: http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts: