[LRflex] Re: Leica to abandon 4/3rds - how good will a Leica R AF system be??
- From: Alex Hurst <corkflor@xxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:04:56 +0100
Howard wrote in part:
The sun is shining in Vancouver this morning and all is right with
the world. But, I haven't had my first coffee yet and that may make
me more curmudgeonly than usual when I offer the following comment.
Howard, I've just delivered my better two thirds to the hospital to
have her bust right wrist de-plastered at last, and now have my first
good cup of coffee in front of me.
Basis my experience with the M8 (dead shutter after 4 months, pixel
lines in the replacement 23 days after receiving it) I would not
rush to buy the R10 no matter what its specs. Also, based on Leica's
history of slow development and not being competitive with the
latest and fastest technology - especially in the R line - I am
very skeptical that their autofocus will be up to competing with the
latest from Canon and Nikon.
I agree. A digital camera body these days is basically a
purpose-built computer in a camera-shaped housing. And we all know
that even the newest model of computer will be more or less obsolete
in six months' time as the latest technological developments are
incorporated. Which is not to say that older models cannot be
perfectly satisfactory. This email's being typed on a Mac which is
seven years old but runs the latest operating system; my Nikon D200
has long been superseded by more up to date models, but is still a
fine digital camera for my purposes. It even accepts nearly all my
old manual focus Nikkors.
But this does indeed contrast with Leica's previous style of organic
development. Look at the longevity of the M series over 50 years and
its constant refinement in small steps, though they chopped and
changed a lot with SLRs out of economic necessity. Even the M8 could
be defined as the M rangefinder system with a lot of computer
hardware tacked on.
I, too, am very doubtful whether Leica by itself can go through the
cycles of hardware development fast enough to be anything other than
a niche player in the digital market. For this reason its current
alliances with Japanese manufacturers seem to make a lot of sense in
terms of maintaining sales volume and gaining hardware and software
expertise.
Which leaves us with that holy of holies, the quality of Leica glass.
This is still an article of faith for many of us here, though a lot
of people are now using it on non-Leica bodies. But with AF now more
or less a given market requirement for new cameras, it's not only
about the quality of the optics but also about the sophistication of
all other computer hardware which has to be built-in to the lens
assembly.
So, like Howard, I wouldn't rush out and buy an R10 even if I had
enough in my piggy bank to do so. Leica's history of bugs with the M8
does not inspire confidence. OTOH, I might be sorely tempted by the
full-frame successor to the semi-pro Nikon D200, which must be in the
pipeline for some time next year as the pro version has already been
launched. And it'll be around a quarter of the price of an
R10......pity I can't use it with my Leica SLR glass.
Best
Alex in rather damp and gloomy Cork.
--
Alex & Carmel Hurst
Waterfall
Near Cork
Ireland
Tel: +353 21 454 3328
Mobile: +353 87 245 7048 (A)
+353 87 988 9927 (C)
email: corkflor@xxxxxx
Home Pages: http://www.iol.ie/~corkflor
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
