[LRflex] Re: Leica 'grade' Super Wides? (was R glass on Nikon question - hopefully the last one)
- From: George Lottermoser <imagist3@xxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:23:58 -0600
My R 21 SA performs admirably;
as does the 15 Super Elmar (though a quirky lens).
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Richard Ward wrote:
> Hi Aram,
> I wonder which Leica wide angles (beyond say 24mm) are of premium quality?
> My
> understanding is that in the R mount the pickings get slimmer as the angles
> get
> wider and looking to a Zeiss or 'whomever' gets to be a reasonable choice.
> The
> M's on the other hand have some splendid 'film' lenses to choose from ranging
> from cheep voightlanders to pricey Leica's, but that Digital really put a cat
> amongst the pidgeons as far as image quality goes. That the M mount's narrow
> lens to sensor distances make color shifts, chromatic abberations, and other
> anomalies, a 'right nightmare' to cope with as a lens/camera designer and
> makes
> seamless usage by photog's a near impossibility.
> Anyway... what's the options here?
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
