[LRFlex] Re: Leica DMR
- From: "Tim Bedsted" <Tim.Bedsted@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:47:02 +0200
Dave,
Could you please elaborate on that?
Regards,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Saalsaa
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2005 8:39 AM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRFlex] Re: Leica DMR
I wouldn't be so sure of that statement. Look at what has happened with the
advance of digital cameras in the last two years.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ornello Pederzoli" <ornellopederzoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 4:20 PM
Subject: [LRFlex] Re: Leica DMR
> I'm sure that the quality of the Leica digital back
> will exceed the competetion for several years. If a
> second becomes available, I'm sure you could sell it
> for a pretty penny.
>
> --- David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
