Hello Juan, Thanks for providing these interesting and enlightening excerpts from the interview. > From: Juan Gea-Banacloche <banacloj@xxxxxxx> > Leica Fotograf Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 13:56:11 -0400 > > The current issue of LFI has an interview with Mr. Lee that I found > very interesting. > > "Take the Leica R system: the R crowd are the most die-hard Leica > fans of all. I have a Leicaflex SL, R4, R4s, R4s2, R5, two R7s and > six lenses. I am a die-hard Leicaflex guy and a serious fan of the > Leica R". > Interesting that his collection doesn't include an R8 or R9. I can only hope that his taste has an impact on the envelope of the R10. > "[...] The R of today is a big camera with an add-on digital back. > We've got to do something about that, too!" > Well, the R8/9+DMR is not the only bulky digital camera on the market. C & N "pro" models are quite a handful, too. Frankly, if I wanted to lug around that much bulk, I'd take my 6008i instead, because it's smaller, probably lighter, and provides a significant boost in image quality. ;-) > "What do the customers really need? Do they really need a 60 percent > MTF at 40 lppmm at f/1.4? That's not a need. If you build it, you'll > kill yourself making it, and sure, everybody will go "wow!" - but > that doesn't mean it will sell. (...) A need state is knowing you are > in posession of something superior". > This has some interesting implications. > From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@xxxxxxx> > Leica Foto Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:05:46 -0700 > > good try Steven...a nice butter up job... > > but the sort of thing people, businessmen, politicians, doctors say > when they don't have anything to say, or they don't want to say > anything...... > What would you have Steven say that would impart more information about the direction he is taking the company? I think his credentials and experience bodes well for Leica. > From: "a aa" <classwp@xxxxxxxxx> > > I interpret this to mean they will release 'cost effective' lenses for > the R , not unlike the 28 Elmarit Asph, which are not necessarily > performance-first designs. > Not being an owner of this lens, I would appreciate your insights into how its performance suffers. In comparison to what? > Quite frankly, I don't think a 4/3rds camera is the sole answer to > Leica's digital problems. At the very least they will need to have a > full, or nearly ful-frame sensor system, to replace the current R > line, and perhaps market a 4/3rds Panasonic based system in parallel. > I don't see much of a future for 35mm format sensors. The trend is toward sub-35mm sensors with better performance. I'm hard pressed to come up with a scenario that would impact this direction. Consider the DMR and M8 as indicators. Those who have invested "heavily" in lenses for 35mm format will just have to adjust their expectations. > From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx> > > And what if 4/3 goes the way of APS-film cartridges? > That was supposedly a revolution too - Leica must, IMO, address the > people who want a 28mm lens to create images that their users are used > to seeing from a 28mm lens - they won't even get past first base > without a full frame sensor - Canon did it with the 5D at a lower-than-Leica > price - that's what Lee means with competitive. > I don't know about that. Where does the 5D stand today? Will there be a full-frame successor? Given that the smaller sensor size of the DMR and M8 provide performance that some here feel is superior to the 5D, what is the motivation to launch a product that would have to sell for considerably more than either of those cameras due to the cost of developing a new sensor that would have a such a small production run (even if they could build the expertise to manage the manufacture of such a sensor)? To paraphrase the excerpt, Leica could kill themselves making it, and a few people would go "wow", but could they sell it? I think that may be in part what Lee meant by beinig competitive. Neil ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/