On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:21:15 -0800
(GMT-08:00)
wildlightphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Of course you could also have used something other than
>ISO 100.
Nikon does that fine, but I haven't got one, yet? Waiting to see if the R9.2 Diesel can beat that. Why not after
all. Then imagine 3.2 sec and ISO 16500 with a summilux ... nearly shooting in braille.
I've also had success at 1/15 sec with the
>280mm lens, considering its nearly 6x magnification
>equivalent to 3 seconds with a 50mm lens, but it's not
>something I'd expect to work every
time.
That's an achievement, of course. No monopod involved?
Now, 3.2sec when you read that M users claim 1/8th as the lower limit in good conditions, I think it makes a
valuable difference.
This without
>adding extra air/glass surfaces to the lens or
>de-centering any elements, as
optical image stabilization
>does.
Out of my purpose and interest in those light conditions. Better that shot than none IMHO. No artistic or
photographic value. Just a reminder of a nice Princess asleep while the parents were celebrating.
And I simply wanted to share my surprise.
Thanks again for viewing and commenting.
Amitiés
Philippe
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
