Thanks Aramtwo new versions now posted - waiting for the Aristocats to start chasing each other and get damaged ears ...
Bien amicalement Phili^^e Aram Langhans wrote:
Much better on my calibrated PC monitor. Had a cat just like that when I was growing up. Even had a damaged ear. Aram-----Original Message----- From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leicareflex- bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philippe AMARD Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:48 AM To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [LRflex] Re: IMG: PAW 11 Alt. Phx - Douglas's edit is now up thanks again Douglas - I've just posted a new edit next to yours <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/2009-PAW-11-Alt1- remake-1090018.jpg.html <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/2009-PAW-11-Alt1->> is the fur any better ? TIA Ph Douglas Sharp wrote:Steve, a quick and dirty bit of dodging, burning and blur on the jpg between 2 translations - the overall balance looks quite good, but it's not exactly state of the art image processing :-) Just a pointer in the direction I thought it might possibly go. Perhaps it now needs some fur recovery software. It also lost a bitof"warmth when I played around with various colour saturationparameters- a bit of red and yellow need to be put back in. Cheers Douglas Steve Barbour wrote:On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Philippe AMARD wrote:Thanks David No hard feeling - I am here to learn after all. :-D Douglas has sent me an edit that works better . :-) It is the last one here http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/?g2_page=3terrific... nice job... what happened to the tip of that cat's tail ? SteveI'll go back to the RAW file as soon as I can Thanks again Philippe David Young wrote:At 3/16/2009, you wrote:David Young wrote:At 3/16/2009, you wrote:Well cats and paws, this should make sense for a few alternates to my PAW 11 Starting here : http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/Ingra-1090018.jpg.htmlHi Philippe! 0018 is very dark ... though on my calibrated monitor, there is detail in the lighter fur, but not in the darker patchesWhat I wanted was the eyes - yet have you seen the first one large? if not can you confirm that all detail is lost thanks for viewing and for helping David PhilippeGood Mornin' Philippe! Viewed large, it shows a wee bit more detail on my monitor, but is still lacking detail in the dark fur. The eyes look good, but IMHO, the eyes (though sharp) are not enough to carry the photo. Sorry to sound so negative, but the others look good! Cheers! --- David Young Logan Lake, BC Wildlife Photos: www.furnfeather.net Personal Website: www.main.furnfeather.net ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.17/2007 - Release Date: 03/17/09 10:18:00------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/