[LRflex] Re: IMG: More Boobies
- From: David Young <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:55:15 -0800
On 21/02/2009, you wrote:
I visited Waimanalo again yesterday morning and found a couple more
Red-footed Boobies:
http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/sulidae/rfbo02.html
http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/sulidae/rfbo03.html
My previous experience with these birds at this location suggested
that a lens as long as the 560mm lens wasn't required, and I wanted
the benefit of an automatic diaphragm so I used the 280mm f/4 with
1.4x APO-Extender instead. Other technical stuff: R8/DMR, ISO 400,
shoulder stock. All comments welcome.
Both great catches, Doug!
But I must agree with the almost universal opinion that the second is
the better of the two.
Thanks for sharing with us. :-)
Questions...
1) are these full frame with the 280/4+1.4ex?
2) How is the little one doing? :-)
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net
Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
