[LRflex] Re: I finally got a olympus 35 macro, quizz anyone ?
- From: Bille Xavier F. <hot_billexf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:15:48 +0100
Right on spot Richard!
David has used the same explanation as yours to emphisize the point!
cheers
---------------------------------
Xavier F. BILLE
Maisons-Alfort - France.
> CC: ilovaussiesheps@xxxxxxxxxxx
> From: ilovaussiesheps@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: I finally got a olympus 35 macro, quizz anyone ?
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:46:48 -0500
>
> I haven't partaken of his DVD's, but I'll give a go on your quizz:
>
> Her eyes aren't in focus.
> The left one (in the image) is almost sharp while the right one is
> pretty soft.
> (Her right eye almost sharp her left eye not)
>
> Generally speaking, it's hard for viewers to like portraits of people
> where the eyes aren't very clearly rendered. My understanding is that
> it's more of a psychological issue than a photographic one. It's also
> behind the dirth of blurry eyes in painted portraits over the centuries.
>
> R.
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2011, at 3:36 AM, Bille Xavier F. wrote:
>
> >
> > http://xavierf.b.free.fr/Temp/L1080002_dev.jpg
> >
> > Quizz: why this portrait of Ayda is almost but not quite good? Hint,
> > the picture is taken at f3.5 (full aperture) at quite close distance.
> >
> > Now, another take, this time, using the Manual Focus, the live view
> > with the enlarged focus window and a tripod (f10), the object is
> > 40mm (1 3/4 inch roughly) and I did not use the full magnification
> > offered by the lens (1:1) :
> >
> > http://xavierf.b.free.fr/Temp/L1070989_dev.jpg
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
