In a message dated 03/06/2011, George Lottermoser said ... > On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:57 PM, David Young wrote: > > http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Cactus.html > > > > C&C welcomed, as always. > 'tis a lovely presentation of a marvelous specimen. > (I think that if you desaturated it a bit > you could reclaim some of the detail in the reds. > One of the issues with digital color > is this loss of detail due to saturation. > Or perhaps you want the flat look?) Hi George! Thanks for the suggestion. The original jpeg (from RAW) had more detail in the full sized image, but seemed to lose it when the size was reduced. I've lowered the saturation and behold! Just as you said, the detail (or, at least some of it) was restored. For comparisons, here's the original http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Cactus.html and here is the reduced saturation version. http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Cactus-2.html I think I like the second version better. Rose likes the fully saturated one, so.... Thanks, once again, for the pointer, and for taking the time to look and comment. :-) Cheers! > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ -- David Young - Photographer Logan Lake, CANADA Wildlife: www.furnfeather.net Personal: www.main.furnfeather.net A micro-lender through www.Kiva.org. ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/