Thanks Gary More questions soon Phileicangenieux in a rush Gary Todoroff wrote: >At 02:03 PM 12/14/06, you wrote: > > >>Hi List, >> >>Following the thread on zooms (back to 35mmm), I went back to Gary's >>Lympalog, which, as a new 4/3 user, triggered two series of questions: >> >>a) I am still without a 4/3 / Leica ring as I cannot decide which to >>choose. >>Should it be a very cheap one (made in c..) or the much more expensive >>ones (made in C ??). >> >> > >Phillipe - I bought the very first available 4/3 adapter, which came >from Hong Kong for about $100 (see first entry of my Lympa Log: >http://northcoastphotos.com/Lympa_2006_03_02.htm ). >It has worked just fine and fits the same as when I first received it >- good piece of gear. You could always buy the cheapest adapter and >keep it as a spare in case you want to upgrade to something higher priced. > > > >>Has any user noticed or heard from the horse's mouth (that's where Gary >>could help, he was so close to that horse on his lympalog ;-) ) of >>failures or damage caused by a ring to a 4/3 body? >>What about wear and tear? >> >> > >No percept able wear on the E-330 lens mount at all for me. > > > > >>b) The second question is mainly for Gary: On the Lympalog you wrote >>that the Zuiko 7-24 is smashing. Do you still think so? Any problem, >>failure, disappointment with it since? >>Have others used other wides on their D3, Olygrail or L1? >> >> > >That big hunk of glass continues to amaze me - very sharp and >contrasty with WIDE images. I find myself using it very often with >the Live View tilted at 90 degrees and the camera set down on a table >or something for slow shutter speed interior shots. Along with live >view it was my other reason for going with Olympus. After many years >being used to Leica optics, the 7-14mm f4 lens does not disappoint in >any way. I think it is a "ground-breaking" kind of lens and I >appreciate it in the same way that I do the Leica APO 70-180 jewel. > > > > > >>The Vario that came with the L1 is a great lense I think, but I used to >>preferably shoot with shorter or longer lenses, the Angie 70 x 3 + ring >>might do the trick on one end, and the Zuiko on the other. >> >> > >My Zuiko 14-54mm 2.8-3.5 lens takes at least half of my photos. The >35mm equivalent of 28-108mm is an ideal range for general purpose. >Just had it out in the rain a couple days ago and it was comforting >to know that Olympus built it as a water resistant lens. Would love >to compare it with Leica's similar 14-50mm 4/3 lens! I'm really >looking forward to the Leica 25mm 1.4 prime lens, due out in April. > >Regards, >Gary > > > > >>Thanks all for sharing your experience and advice. >> >>Yours >>Phileicangemix >> >> > >------ >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/