Hello Herman, Let me begin with my personal photographic history that I started out with a well worn Minolta SRT-102 and Rokkor 50mm f2 back I picked up for a Junior College course back in the Eighties. Over the next few years I upgraded through the x370/570/700 bodies and in my Sophmore Year in college (majoring in photography) I made the dive into Autofocus with an EOS 620/Rebel Kit I put together over time. I also got into Rolleiflex TLR shooting and 4x5 View Camera Photography. I come to the challenge of adapting Manual Focus Lenses to dSLR's with a set of experiences fairly well suited to tackling it. After having climbed under a dark cloth in fading light with my loupe to use on a 40year old ground glass attempting to focus the image coming through a 50 year old f11 max aperture lens - the 'problems' of focusing with a stopped down lens on a modern quality dSLR has a much different sense of difficulty! Anyway, I still very much miss the porro prism rings and split image focus assist devices missing on these 'modern' cameras. I've made note on this list that the 5dmk2's have user changeable focus screens a couple of times, but today I discovered in my ongoing research efforts that the 5Dmk2's don't have Canon OEM Screens available which have Focus Assist Devices! :-) That would be an OOPs on my part barring there being a canon one out there made of 'Un-obtain-ium' or something, but I lean toward me having OOPs-ed! Which brings me to finding the following products available after some googling around on FredMiranda.com and following some links posted there: "http://www.slrdaren.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=65_71&zenid=291dd52958ca3b3f61e0c2c6e8299805"; I have zip experience with these specific products nor the retailer providing them so remember to conduct a proper due diligence before purchase! :-) Yet, I thought it important to give a shout out to R to EOS lens adapting members about there being a fairly reasonable route to re-acquiring the wonderful assistance of a Rapid Return Mirror that actually helps someone to manually focus! I dearly love, sincerely love, the wonders and joys of a well designed and well implemented Auto Focus System - But the price of admission essentially has usually been the loss of Split Image Devices and Porro Prisms. Now, While spending 80 to 90 Dollars on a camera accessory can be quite an expense, compared to the acquisition costs / inherent value of our R lenses themselves, it could put that price into a much different light. I know that when I scroll through eBay to keep a sense of the 'used' marketplace for R glass, the price point for any lens essentially is in hundreds of dollars and thousand dollar lenses are quite 'common' (much to much so for my tastes anyway!). Anyway hope someone finds some of this info of use. I know that Focus Screen Selection is one of those things leaning me towards the EOS 1D/DS family of cameras, but there are options for the 5D line as well. Sincerely, Richard. ________________________________ Be Nice To Your Children! They Will Be Choosing Your Nursing Home :-) ________________________________ ________________________________ From: Herman Kempers <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 2:10:23 PM Subject: [LRflex] Re: Using R lenses on digital bodies..AN EXIF COMMENT. hi Aram, Richard and all I'm new in the adapterworld- just recently thinking of using some R lenses on my 5dII There are some reasons to do this, and some to give it a second thought. R lenses have a lot of quality ; the way they are built, their size and weight (compared to the fast Canon L lenses ) their image quality (although, when it comes to absolute sharpness/resolution on HiRes digicams I have my doubts, but for me and hopefully most people, image quality is more than just resolution...) and something trivial like 'a feeling'. And not to forget MF. Manual Focus with AF lenses works much different then with a pure MF lens. I like to focus manual. The second thoughts are for the use of an adapter; does it focus on infity, is the lens not wobling on the body, by the lack of good screens (Canon) hard to focus and the mentioned exposure corrections you should make. And it is a little 'unnatural' /artificial -what's the proper English word for this?? . Richard was right on all his points, and very right on the point that with R we use lenses from the analogue/chemical era on a camera designed for digital /electronic photography. This causes some communication problems, which can be solved by a little thinking, so working a little slower. For me not a problem, I use mainly an exposuremeter when working digital. Working digital is for my business, R5 + film is for fun. (BTW this weekend bought a R4s and R3 mot.body :-)) love on first sight. As far I understand the problem mentioned by Aram is that Canon does not recognize the lens and sets to a default which probally is f 2.0 So every lens, regardless it's real full opening, attached with an adapter, the Canon exposuremeter willl think aperture open is 2.0 (Yes this is strange, funny and silly) So attaching a 4.0 lens the exposure is 2 stops overexposed. The programwork mentioned by Aram and Richard as a possible solution may work, but I stick to an exposure meter........ My choice: As Canon has no alterative for a wider angle than the 1,4 /24 ( First L lens then is a 14 mm- or the 17 Tilt & Shift . I never use zoomlenses) my Elmarit 19 mm is the ideal focal length (second version, so mirror problems-hesitate to make it fit) For the use of the 60 Macro only the adapter is needed. (and some thinking) Too bad there will be no R10.......... and thank you Richard for your note on the EXIF.... herman ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/