[LRflex] Re: Film vs. Digital Gamut
- From: bob palmieri <rpalmier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:22:27 -0500
On May 9, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Douglas Herr wrote:
>
> Good job of sneaking up on these birdies, I agree with your evaluation
> of the Scarlet Tanager's colors. I wouldn't be able to tell you if
> the 20D or your workflow or color space is the limiting factor. I ran
> into the same thing with the Mountain Bluebird in Yellowstone a few
> years ago. I felt that Provia 100F rendered the bird's striking blue
> better than K64 did, but still not quite what I recall from real life.
>
>
Doug -
Thanks for your take on this. Interesting observation about the
relative abilities of those two films in this instance. I'm not
holding out for absolute color accuracy here , I just want the viewer
to feel some of that shock of colors that radiates from this critter.
As I recall, the Mountain Bluebird you posted looked pretty great to me.
Bob Palmieri
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
