> Yet, we have a G1 at home, rarely used these days and even if I > mounted R and Canon FD glass on it for fun, it never occurred to me > that the FT-ZD 7-14 might fare any better on an MFT than its MFT > lumix counterpart. > > I also think the discrepancy between the bulk of the lens and the > tiny bodies of MFTs would be more than a hindrance. > > Following Ted I tend to think simple now - and following George I > consider systems. > > Hope this helps, not selling my lens, but you not making a mistake. Hi Philippe! I am considering adding one of the new OM-D MFT cameras to my stable. Thus, I am considering the adapter to my current FT lenses. Yes, I know they are larger, but they also offer a 200mm (400 eq. c/f) f2.8 lens that I love. I would also buy a set of smaller, appropriately sized lenses for travel. But, I'd also like to use my older lenses on the 16mp body. Only time will tell if this is truly a practical idea. Of course, first I have to *find* an OM-D that I can look at, and see just how good (or not) the EVF is. And that, my friend, is proving difficult in my area. Cheers! David. ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/