Hello Douglas, Sorry for the late answer. The shot was taken near my home, a micro brwery offering pub food as well. A nice family place. here is the site: http://www.les3brasseurs.com/ As for the software Neat Image: I've used it mainly in automatic mode after it had built a profile (match factor 100%) In those things, first make sure you master the auto mode before going in depth, in my opinion. I have discovered that NeatImage can unblurr a picture, did a few tests, it is impressive. For the price, it is a great tool. There is one great thing about the film less camera, you can actually choose the type of support (tungsten, daylight, casted lights, etc). A bit like if you change the magazines loaded with different types. This is really a great improvement. BTW, a off topic but leica: I was presented with the Panasonic DMC-LX1K, it feels great, better than what it looks on the panasonic site. Thanks for having considered this post. --------------------------------- Xavier F. BILLE Maisons-Alfort - France. >From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx> >Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [LRflex] Re: Discovering the Digital world with NeatImage.com >Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:15:23 +0100 > >Nice shot Xavier, very nice indeed, where was it taken?. > >Are you using advanced or standard mode in NeatImage? > >It will probably take a few weeks to get used to all the possibilities >available in the advanced mode, I've had Neat Image for 2 years now and >I'm still learning what all the options do. I do find that for >sharpening in advanced mode I usually set the high frequency slider at >around 100, mid at 40 and low at 15 on the Y (luminance) channel, this >works better than when you set the option RGB, check the results on >something with edges, when they get too bright then reduce each slider >until the edges look ok, starting with the lowest frequency first.. >Default mode tends to oversmooth (remove too much noise) a little so >play around with the noise amount sliders and reduce the levels until >everything looks "realistic". >What you say about digital and film is close to what I've experienced - >for film you have to develop a slightly different approach, the >automatic profile needs a lot more fine tuning and a delicate touch to >get it right, I'll look for a couple of examples when I've time and post >them. >Glad to hear you like it. >Douglas > >Bille Xavier F. wrote: > > >Hello to all. > > > >After the recent posts of Douglas S., I loaded the demo software by > >NeatImage. > > > >The software is nice as it can create automatically a profile for a >camera > >and a certain type of image. > >The results are really interesting and easy to achieve. > > > >I wonder what would be the results on the DMR by Leica.... > > > >I gave it some tests and in fact, it works best on the images produced by >a > >digital camera, not really on the images produced on a scanner file. > > > >Here is a detail of a night scene before processing: > >http://xavierf.b.free.fr/Temp/Detail130002.jpg > > > >Here is a detail of the image after the processing by NeatImage > >http://xavierf.b.free.fr/Temp/Detail130002_filtered.jpg > > > >And here is the result of the process: > >http://xavierf.b.free.fr/Temp/PB130002_filtered.jpg > > > >(original image http://xavierf.b.free.fr/Temp/PB130002.JPG) > > > > > >--------------------------------- > >Xavier F. BILLE > >Maisons-Alfort - France. > > > > > >------ > >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > >Archives are at: > > www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > > > > >------ >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >Archives are at: > www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/