[LRflex] Re: DMR shots on photo.net
- From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 21:13:31 +0100
Aram : I couldn't agree more with you.
What struck me while perusing the literature on photonet and other
sites, is that some pros "simply" shoot pictures. And they then trust
some other pro with "processing" (their words) their digital files -
just as in the "good old times". Nothing has changed as you state it.
About manipulation : One individual's "reality" depends on the
instruments they use to perceive and capture their environments. Using
any lense that doesn't show what a human eye actually sees, is
manipulation. I'm no fish, and yet like like fish-eyed views sometimes.
I don't have Tex Avery's big bad woolf's protruding eyes, and though I
like so much to see David's or Douglas' long shots of wild animals.
Thanks for manipulating ;-)
Manipulation is where ART (or is it craftmanship?) steps in; when you
may choose and orchestrate the process, ideally from beginning to the end.
Indeed, isn't Photography about what you give people to see?
Regards (means "the way you look at things" in French) ;-)
Phileicangenieux
Aram Langhans wrote:
>One thing to remember is that ALL the images that you see in this way
>(internet) are manipulated in one way or another. The scanner does some
>manipulation and getting the image ready for posting also involves some
>manipulation. Whether or not it is Photoshop, paintshop pro or some other
>program, you cannot see an unmanipulated photo on the internet. Some
>manipulate more than others. But this has always been true, even in the
>darkroom. The only way to view an unmanipulated photo taken with a film
>camera is if you shoot slides. Even print film is manipulated before you
>get the print back.
>
>however, I second your thoughts in that there are an awful lot of nice
>images being shown to justify digital.
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Dr. Puritz" <drpuritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: [LRflex] Re: DMR shots on photo.net
>>Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:43:32 -0500
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>While looking around at the work of many artists, I can't help but very
>>very
>>impressed by the high quality of digital images that are being displayed.
>>I
>>suspect many of the images are manipulated and created with the aid of
>>Photoshop and other editing programs. Nevertheless, I wonder how many of
>>such images could have been created with our traditional film cameras
>>without Photoshop. The creative possibilities of digital work seem
>>endless.
>>
>>Elliot
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Bille Xavier F." <hot_billexf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 1:47 PM
>>Subject: [LRflex] Re: DMR shots on photo.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>oooops, Sorry Andrew
>>>
>>>Here is the link:
>>>http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00F6nv&tag=
>>>
>>>Subject is Summilux-R 35mm
>>>
>>>I like the colors.
>>>
>>>But also there is a link to b&w:
>>>http://www.photo.net/bboard/big-image?bboard_upload_id=27924984
>>>
>>>lovely.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------
>>>Xavier F. BILLE
>>>Maisons-Alfort - France.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: Andrew Nemeth <azn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: [LRflex] Re: DMR shots on photo.net
>>>>Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:50:58 +1100
>>>>
>>>>On 03 Feb 2006, at 18:02, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>There are a few pictures of the DMR and Summicron 35mm (equ 47mm) on
>>>>>photo.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Er, where?
>>>>
>>>>There are hundreds of thousands of links on photo.net!
>>>>
>>>>Care to post a link to the DMR pictures in question?...
>>>>
>>>>:?)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Regds,
>>>>
>>>>Andrew N.
>>>><http://nemeng.com>
>>>>Blue Mountains Australia
>>>>
>>>>------
>>>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>>> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>>>>Archives are at:
>>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>------
>>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>>>Archives are at:
>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>>
>>>
>>------
>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>>Archives are at:
>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
>http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
