[LRflex] Re: DMR question .
- From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:48:39 -0800
David, Doug and Steve,
In the engineering world when doing any testing, the motto always
must be "SEPARATE THE VARIABLES" in other words, change
one item at a time.
Your tests would have validity if you had the same Leica lens on a
Canon and DMR, with the same subject, lighting and post processing.
Otherwise you are indulging in self abuse.
Notify us if you have valid test data, not opinions.
Jerry
Steve Barbour wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Douglas Herr wrote:
>
> > David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/comparisons.htm
> >>
> >> ... I believe the differences are obvious to those who look.
> >
> > shazaam!! yes the difference is obvious. My R8 is no longer for sale.
>
> sirry guys, the difference is obvious, but what does it prove?
> (different person, scene, light, shadows etc....lens too)
>
> and yes I am very impressed by the DMR, but so what....Steve
>
> >
> >
> > Doug Herr
> > Birdman of Sacramento
> > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> > ------
> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> > Archives are at:
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.0.0/268 - Release Date: 02/23/2006
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
