On May 12, 2007, at 10:14 AM, David Young wrote: > Steve Barbour wrote: > >> David Young wrote: >>> So, this is my theory on why Leica do not wish to say that v1.3 is >>> *not* coming. OTOH, I would not hold my breath, waiting for it! In >>> the end, it may never come. But Leica would look very foolish... >> >> >> more foolish than they look right now... ? > > > Hi Steve! > > Why should they look foolish on this one? They've publicly said, > months ago, that the delay was due to Imacon and that they'd hoped to > have it released by the end of last year. > >> you mean they don't know? > > As in do they not know when, or even if, it will come? No, they > don't know. > > But I do know that they are making every effort to get v1.3 corrected > & released. However, if Imacon remains intransigent, it may not > happen. > >> billshit is still bullshit, any way you package it... > > So tell me, Steve. Why is it that if Leica (or any firm, for > that .... sorry David, I took all the doubletalk and uncertainty to mean that there was no clear statement made to the leica supporting public.... where is the statement ? Steve ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/