[LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- From: Scott Gardner <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:22:11 -0800 (PST)
Um, let's keep in mind that this compares a Leica prime to a <$100 Canon zoom
'kit' lens using what appears to be low resolution files on a screen.
I suggest it would be more useful to compare prime to prime using, if possible,
full size files. Actually, I'm curious Aram . . . what is the byte count of
the original files?
If the screen is final destination for an image, it makes sense to judge it
there, but if a fine print is the goal, the screen is a weak, if necessary,
substitute.
my two cents worth/Scott Gardner
Douglas Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Aram Langhans wrote:
> http://www.naches.wednet.edu/NachesValley/nvhs/science/langhans/compare/compare.htm
Holy fuzz!! I wouldn't think there's be much difference at f/8 but so much for
what I'd think! The edge in particular, what a difference!!
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball.
Other related posts:
