[LRFlex] Re: Change at the top.
- From: "Patrick Werner" <patrickw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:12:27 -0400
I had no idea that quality in digital had come so far. I stand
corrected.
-----Original Message-----
From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Young
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:09 AM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRFlex] Re: Change at the top.
Bob Palmieri wrote:
>Regarding this weddingsnaps/digi thread, I had an interesting gig this
>weekend in which I shot 2/3 digital, 1/3 film.
>
>The dig ain't lookin' so good to me - film will be back later today -
>I'll
>keep you posted.
>
>Fortunately I should have postable examples from both.
Hi Bob!
I'll be interested to hear your final analysis on digi vs. film for your
wedding shots.
However, for most pros, with top line cameras and top-notch printers, I
don't think the problem is with quality, but rather the amount of time
spent in PhotoShop, when they could be out making money (or sleeping!).
Keep us posted, will ya?
Thanks.
----------
David Young, | égalité, liberté,
Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais.
Personal Web-site at:
http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
Leica Reflex Forum web-page:
http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
