And I assume they will meter wide open, which is the only drawback of the R on Canon. The metering is almost perfect. A bit of overexposure above f-4, but not near the situation with R on Canon. Maybe only 1 stop difference max. I have only used one lens thus far, and will be converting three more in a day or to when we get to my father-in-law's in Southern Cal. "Camping out" in Minden, NV tonight after a long 12 hour drive across some long stretches of compact snow. Longest was about 100 miles. One more stretch tomorrow from Mono Lake to Mammoth Lakes on 395. Aram -------------------------------------------------- From: <wildlightphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 8:44 AM To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Canon Lens Review > Richard Ward wrote: > >>>> > I saw on the ZeissRumors Site recently that the big 'Z' is setting up to > roll out some Zooms and dip a toe into the Telephoto Market, presumably > for > all mounts like their other Z offerings. > <<< > > If the performance lives up to the name's reputation this could be a > workable solution. Not necessarily for R lenses but for R-quality > results. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web > > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/