Hi David. I think that greatly improved the shadows in the background.
Much smoother. That was where the problem was to my eye. Thanks for
giving it a try.
Aram
On 9/28/2018 9:28 PM, David Young wrote:
OK... At your suggestion, I ran the image through Neat Image, a very effective
noise reduction program.
To be honest, Aram, it made a reasonable improvement at full size, but when
reduced to 768 pixels tall, for web use, the difference is there, but almost
unnoticeable.
Here are both the original image and the "improved" one. Scroll down for the
second one.
http://www.furnfeather.ca/look/MaggsPark-2.html
Comments? Anyone?
David.
Great colors and lighting. We saw some nice color around Aspen that I------
will have to post soon. Have you tried a touch of grain reduction on
it, especially on the background? Might improve the aesthetics of the
photo, if not the composition, which needs no improvement.
Aram
On 9/26/2018 6:46 PM, David Young wrote:
I have a bad habit, I confess ... I set a high ISO, when needed, but------
regularly forget to set it back, when it's no longer needed.
Today's example was a long shot. over Logan Lake, of Magg's Park, the
main park in our little town. Shot at ISO 1250, when 200 would have
been appropriate. [sigh].
But the late afternoon light on the trees, was irresistible. Shot
just over an hour ago.
http://www.furnfeather.ca/look/MaggsPark.html
Enjoy!
David
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://lrflex.furnfeather.ca/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://lrflex.furnfeather.ca/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://lrflex.furnfeather.ca/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
