Nice shots. The scanner is the same one I have been using for about 4 years now. Check out my other shots in my Leica gallery. Most were taken with the 100 APO and scanned with the same scanner. I will be testing tomorrow, for sure. Aram >From: Colin Howarth <colin@xxxxxxxxxx> >Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [LRflex] Re: Am I wasting my time/money? >Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 22:44:22 +0200 > >I agree with Doug. That's surely not the best one can do with the 100 >APO. > >Maybe the lens is misaligned? >Maybe the scanner really isn't as good as the last one? > > > >I'll mention again my low-speed film shot > >http://gallery.leica-users.org/album109/lea_2_1000 > >The full frame is http://gallery.leica-users.org/album109/ >lea2_source (as scanned - no cleanup) > >and the 100 % crop http://gallery.leica-users.org/album109/lea_2_crop > > >This was handheld on a Contax RTS II with the Zeiss 85/1.4 on ISO 20 >SPUR Orthopan UR. >Scanned on a Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400 II at 5400 dpi. > >That makes the scan approximately 37 Mpixels. > > >OK, this isn't a comparison (maybe I'll do one soon) but one can >still get good results on film :) > > >colin >------ >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ _________________________________________________________________ Search from any web page with powerful protection. Get the FREE Windows Live Toolbar Today! http://get.live.com/toolbar/overview ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/