[LRFlex] Re: APO vs Asph

  • From: Charles Cason <cec@xxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:20:27 -0600

The lens I have is the Vario-Elmar-R 35-70 f/4. It was made in 1997 and has a macro range included. One of the eight lens elements is Aspherical. Leica says it is "a lens rich with contrast our to the frame edges and with distortion extremely contained......performance comparable to the best lenses with a fixed focal length". I think this is the most under rated lens in the leica stable. I have had very good experiences with it as a 'stay on the camera' lens. The new 20-90 f/2.8 is a lens I would love to have but not at a going price of $3295 on eBay. My 35-70 with ROM contacts and the 2X APO with ROM makes a very nice and extremely sharp short tele or portrait lens. Unfortunately the loss of two stops makes it hard to use as a hand held shooter.
Again, thanks for all your answers. I do appreciate not being treated as dumb as I feel sometimes.
Charles


NATSTEK@xxxxxxx wrote:

Wow,
That is a good one.
Leica lenses regularly use "Rare Earth" glass whenever the designers deem it advisable. Rare Earth, is everyone elses designation for "ED", or Extra Low Dispersion, or APO or LD glass.
I think that just one aspherical lens element is all that is needed to call a lens "Aspherical".
I think that this question of the use of both Aspherical and Rare Earth (APO) glass would better be addressed by contacting the great people at the Leica factory technical department. They've always been able to answer any of my questions in the past.
I wish that I could give you a more definitive answer.
Art
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message scanned for viruses by CoreComm <http://www.core.com/>


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
   www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: