Was: New Image. Now: 40D vs 5D.
- From: David Young <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:49:49 -0800
Dave Saalsaa wrote:
David,
I think your reasoning is sound. Maybe because I am using the same
reasoning in replacing my 20D with the 40D. ;-) From what I can
gather in reading test reports, the 40D is a good performer and
significantly better in terms of the viewfinder and sensor noise. I
am staying with the APS sensor camera because it does allow me to
use my Leica glass to good advantage. I have the very excellent
Tokina 12-24 when I need wide lens. So I think the 40 D makes a
very good option for you at the least cost.
Dave
Hi Dave!
I think you "hit the nail on the head" when you added the words "at
least cost".
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Wildlife Photographs: http://www.furnfeather.net
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
Other related posts:
- » Was: New Image. Now: 40D vs 5D.
