Re: Java Might Be Back In The Running
- From: Justin Collier <justinjncr@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lcec.code@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:35:57 -0800
Debian i386 Lenny/Sid Hybrid with Gmail.com on Firefox 3.5.5, why?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Luke Cycon <lcycon.lcec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:53 -0800, Justin Collier wrote:
> > Yeah I (being lazy) don't really want to spend much time learning C/C
> > ++ when I am already very familiar in Java. I think any computing
> > delays caused by the JRE will be too small to make a difference. I
> > vote for Java but I think its good to take a vote to know what the
> > majority of the people want before we make any decisions.
>
> I don't think there will be any computational delays.. They are going to
> use a custom JVM. While this is good, it also means it won't be
> straight java as you know it. There may be some
> Packages/Classes/Methods that no longer exist in the new JVM and there
> may be new ones as well. (Think along the lines of compiling with
> java-dcj in debian).
>
> P.S. Justin, what mail client are you using/what OS right now?
> --
> Luke Cycon <lcycon.lcec@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
