[lanse] Re: UT 2003 rant

  • From: "Jonathan Edger [ Inknet Gaming ]" <gaming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:54:51 +0100

I played the leaked copy & I have to agree with you.
I was hoping the finished game would be much better

Battlefield 1942 has set the standard
so much more fun to play

Regards
Trojan
_____________________________________
Jonathan Edger
gaming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.inknet.uk.com
irc #inknet

-----Original Message-----
From: list@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:list@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 16 September 2002 13:41
To: list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lanse] UT 2003 rant


Am i the only person to miss the point of this game?
In an age of every more demanding gameplay, they have released nothing more
than a quake clone with flashy new graphics.
What is actually new and exiting about this game?
Why do we need this game?
Where is the progression?

Personally if you ignore the graphics , the feel of quake3 or UT is actually
better.
The new charecters feel clumbsy and overweight. The weapons feel inprecise.
(actuall think this is to do with the mouse code).

GO back and play UT or Q3..you will see...

Personally im suprised to see this type of game appear now... The
Deathmatch/CTF has been done before and done better.

/rantoff

Kerr








Other related posts: